Showing posts with label Liberal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Take a Walk With Me

respect1Right, Left, Right, Left...it is simple as that.  Yet today, political discourse in today's society has become so ideologically opposed, that walking has become difficult.  Instead of a walk, it has become more of a stumble, an argument, full of vitriol towards the opposing foot.  Yet, it seems no one is listening.  If neither is willing to listen to the opposing foot, how are we ever going to move the country forward on this walk?
It is my opinion that we all need to show our officials that we can work together to begin walking again.  Left or Right, without showing our shared values, it only sounds like hatred for one another.  Today, I see so much hatred that political discourse has become lost on its walk towards improvements in our society. I am not innocent in partaking in this type of discussion, nor will I claim to be.  However, I have found it enlightening to have reasoned conversations with those who oppose my ideals.

Dear Liberal…Here’s Why I’m So Hostile

I only wish I could take credit for this well crafted piece of writing.  Do not be deceived by the title, this is a thorough explanation of Conservative opposition towards Liberals and the basis from which it stems.  I hope that it brings some understanding to my Liberal friends and foes, a deeper understanding, if you will.  Please take the time to read, you will not be disappointed in the explanations or clarification you will gain in reading.
by Jeremy N. Choate
image
This essay is a bit of departure from my usually reasonable and logical approach to important issues.  That’s not to say that the essay isn’t well-reasoned and is bereft of logical argumentation, but I freely admit that it’s polemical, in nature.  Sometimes you’re just pissed, and you need to vent.  Here’s my vent…
Lately, I must admit that my hostility towards your political ilk has ramped up, pretty dramatically.  No, it’s not because we, at this point in my life, have a half-black president in the White House, and I’m some closet racist who is becoming increasingly frustrated at the prospects of the White Man’s power slipping through my fingers.  I know that you’ve accused our side of such nonsense, and the thought keeps you warm at night, but I can assure you that it is a comfortable fiction of which you should probably divest yourself.

Monday, February 3, 2014

Liberal Lies: Choice

Liberals claim to be the party that promotes choice, yet we do not see choices in Liberalism.  Choices are limited to the "approved" remedy of the bureaucracy and belief systems in Liberalism.  Choice implies freedom, yet, Liberalism always destroys freedom and choice.
As an aside, I now realize how odd the word choice looks when typing it repeatedly.  That is my random thought for the day!

Pro-Choice

Pro ChoiceLiberals consistently talk about the greatness of being pro-choice. After all, it is the mother's choice that matters, not the unborn child, right?
Let me ask this, what is more important in our society; a mother's choice or the right to life?  A mother's choice is nothing more than a decision to be made with horrific consequences, in this case.  God endowed us with the ability to procreate and our right to life.  We protect life on earth as being sacred in many ways; we even protect the rights of animals through cruelty legislation, etc.  Yet, how is an unborn child (a human nonetheless) less protected in the pro-choice argument?   
“No woman can call herself free until she can choose consciously whether she will or will not be a mother.”
― Margaret Sanger
The choice has been made prior to the point of choosing whether or not to be a mother.  The choice was made when a person decides to have sex with a partner.  That was when the freedom of choice occurs, not after the fact.
Mother Teresa choices
“The so-called right to abortion has pitted mothers against their children and women against men. It has sown violence and discord at the heart of the most intimate human relationships. It has aggravated the derogation of the father's role in an increasingly fatherless society. It has portrayed the greatest of gifts--a child--as a competitor, an intrusion and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the dependent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters. And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners.”
― Mother Teresa
Where is the choice of that unborn child?  Liberals also claim to be the protectors of the weak, poor, and innocent children (but, only if they are born first).  The hypocrisy of this position is scathing and yet, no liberal will actually admit to the choice that was already made.

At least Liberalism gave one choice, the choice of birth control.....

Healthcare Choices

The Affordable Care and Patient Act (aka Obamacare) did not increase choice, it limited it.
liberal choiceMany young adults used to choose whether or not to carry health insurance.  This decision was made based upon their finances and other factors.  Yet, with the passing of Obamacare, they no longer have this choice.  This freedom has been stripped away in one fellow swoop of the pen by our Liberal leadership and Liberals in Congress.
Undoubtedly, our choices in insurance plans have also been limited.  Why? You might ask.  Insurance companies are not stupid; they will offer plans that conform to the requirements (no choice) of Obamacare in minimal terms to limit the cost to consumers.  You see, economically speaking, insurance companies want to earn our business by keeping rates as low as possible.  The only way to keep rates low for the healthy is to limit what is covered, especially when other stuff is unnecessary.  Men are going to be forced to pay for ob/gyn appointments and women to pay for prostate exams under this bill.  This is a requirement, not a choice.
"If you like your plan, you can keep it. Period." - President Obama
Sounded like a great choice.  Again, proven profoundly wrong.  No discussion needed and end of story.
At least we get to choose our doctor, right?  Again, no.  Our choice of doctor may or may not be available through Obamacare.
Yes, the choice has been made to not expand this section any further.  You see, this is my choice and I am making it.  To put it bluntly, there are few freedoms in Obamacare and therefore no choices.  I am certain that I could write a 2700+ page book on Obamacare, but this is not the place for it.

Religious Choice

Ah, the Phil Robertson section....yes, it is my choice.  But, it goes further than the recent explosion between Phil Robertson, A&E and the Liberal choosers.
One of the core foundations of our country is the Freedom of Religion.  This infers the right to choose a religion and follow its practices as well.
John Adams Letter to Benjamin Rush Date: 1812
Liberalism, through Obamacare, attempted to squash religious choice in implementing the law.  Catholics, who do not allow contraception in practice, were forced to provide birth control through their insurance plans.  Religious institutions appealed this requirement and were told it was a requirement, not a choice.  Thankfully, appeals to this requirement are slowly being upheld by the courts and should be overturning the requirement in time.  Nonetheless, it was an attempt by Liberals to destroy religious freedom and the practice thereof.

It is not just Catholics under attack.  Christians are regularly the targets of Liberal outcries for religious oppression.  Phil Robertson was attacked for his Christian view on gay marriage by the left.  It was A&E's decision to suspend him and that was their choice, which is not the argument here.  However, the fact that GLAAD (a LIBERAL group) would demand he be silenced is the attack on religious freedom.


religious choiceIn reality, all religious denominations have been under attack by some form of Liberalism in our country.  The examples, again, are so numerous that a book could be written.  Muslims, Islamists, etc. it doesn't matter; they are all being attacked by the Liberals.  Conservatives do not care what your religion is, you have every right to practice it, preach it, and show it.

The only "religions" that seem to be omitted from these attacks are Atheists and Climate Change worshipers.  Of course, they tend to be almost exclusively Liberals, so that explains a lot.

Economic Choice

Financial choices should be up to an individual or family.  Liberals force many things to not be choices when it comes to economics. Again, only the tip of the iceberg will be hit upon.
Individuals used to have the choice to spend their money on healthcare.  As aforementioned above, this choice has been retracted by Obamacare.
Taxes are government force, not a choice.  By forcing the top 40% to pay 106.9% of the tax burden (discussed in The Welfare State: Increasing Government Dependency), this economic choice has been removed.  Liberals are for a highly progressive tax code which steals from the "rich" and gives to the poor.
From the obscene to the absurd;
Nope, you don't have a choice to buy the lightbulb you want either.

Education Choice

Liberals are ALL about government control and NO freedom when it comes to school choice.  If you can not afford a way out, you are stuck with public schools.  Public schools are failing on the education front in so many ways, they are too numerous to list here.
Educational choices have been repeatedly proposed, yet they are shot down by Liberals.  Whether it is a voucher system, tax credits, or other means of allowing school choice, Liberals flatly oppose them.  Yet, we are continually falling behind the rest of the world in education.

Charity Choice

The Liberal "charity" continues to be our government.  Again, forcing people to pay taxes into a charity of Liberal persuasion does not allow for choice.  People have the right to do with their property (money) as they choose.  This choice should include giving to the charities of their liking.  This is not to mention, government is inefficient in actually helping the intended recipients.  Private charity is MUCH more efficient in helping those in need.  The split is astounding; 70% of private charity reaches the intended recipient while government only sends 30%.

Speech Choice (Freedom of Speech)

This is so obvious to me that it needs little said about it.  Here is the gist: Liberals do not believe in freedom of speech unless it supports their position.  They seek to silence any opposition to their worldview and attempt to do so every day.
For more information please read my friend's exceptional piece, showing how absurd this has gotten: Liberals Are Now The Freedom Of Speech Police.

My choice to conclude

While Liberals will argue that they offer choice in other arenas, one has the right not to choose those topics.  Granted, there are so many choices on the limiting of choices by Liberals, it is astounding.  To say the choices are endless (until my speech is censored) is an understatement.  All in all, it is a lie to claim to be Liberal and pro-"choice".

Saturday, November 30, 2013

Don't PC me!

conservative
I have always disliked the term "Politically Correct."  I don't think this term has a true assigned meaning any more.  After all, politicians tend to be liars and rarely correct.  In debate, politically correct takes on multiple meanings; to be correct, would imply a right answer in a discussion regarding opinion.  Debate also requires proper use of language in terms of being politically correct; I certainly would not use the N-word in a political debate! (Or, at all, for that matter!)  Our language has also been distorted by being "PC". English is commonly misused in an attempt to be PC that most no longer know the true meanings of words.  Even our sense of humor has been destroyed by PC terms and uses. How is this really a country for Freedom of Speech, if our speech has become so filtered that discussion becomes lost in a sea of half truths?

Saturday, November 23, 2013

When Winning Just Isn't Enough...

rand-paulOften, I wonder if Conservatives lack something that Liberals have; the "killer instinct" in politics. Now, I know what you are thinking; when I am arguing with a Liberal, you are damn right I have a killer instinct!  But, I am not talking about those of us out here, arguing with Liberals every day.  I am talking about our supposedly Conservative representation at the Federal level.
As I discussed in Silver Linings of an Obamacare Bomb, the opportunity was forthcoming and I could see it.  So, why can't our representation see this?
In recent weeks, we are witnessing the Obama death spiral in politics.  Obama's numbers are plunging into frigid waters where he has never ventured before.  His RCP approval/disapproval ratings have dropped to 40.5% and 55.4%, respectively, as of this week.  That has to be painful, considering Bush had higher approval ratings at this point in his Presidency. And, Liberals claim that Bush was the worst President ever.  No, I am not much of a Bush man myself.

Sunday, November 17, 2013

Liberal Policies Enslave America

Dr. Benjamin Carson was slammed in October for his statement comparing Obamacare to slavery. And, Dr. Carson is correct, not only regarding Obamacare but most Liberal policies and legislation. Americans are not happy right now, and there is good reason.  Not only has the political atmosphere soured, but people are feeling enslaved by their own government.  For a country that was founded upon freedom and individual liberty, this does not go over well with the people.  The shift of policies and legislation to the far left has left the people feeling helpless and under the control of the government.  

Obamacare enslaves Americans on their health care choices and decisions, as well as the cost.  First, Obamacare forces Americans to choose from a limited number of plans which are "approved" under the new law.  This means, as we have seen, cancellations en masse.  Cancellations have far exceeded enrollments, at last count, now topping 5,000,000 cancellations.  Enrollments, which real numbers are hard to come by, are estimated at 100,000.  This number is misleading because the "enrollees" have not yet paid for their plans, therefore, should they really be counted yet?  People have lost their choice of plans, which undermines their freedom.