Don't think the press is in the bag for Clinton in 2016? Compare this piece to the write-ups regarding Rand Paul's speech at UC-Berkley the past few days and the contrasts are startling. While Rand Paul was stated as "appealing to paranoia", Clinton is given the softer title of "appealing to idealism".
Ken Thomas of the Associated Press writes, "Looking out to a theater full of motivated college students, Hillary Rodham Clinton said their generation showed great promise as "open-minded and tolerant" Americans ready to step forward for an important cause."
Meanwhile the "closed-minded and intolerant" gathered to listen to Rand Paul at UC-Berkley, right? But, are we not speaking about our former Secretary of State who felt no remorse for the deaths of Benghazi? "Why does it matter?" I find a serious problem with a candidate who cannot acknowledge the value of human life. The families and friends of the Benghazi four are on the forefront of the minds of Americans.
Clinton also stated,
"It is the work of this century to complete the unfinished business of making sure that every girl and boy, every woman and man, lives in societies that respects their rights no matter who they are, respects their potential and their talents, gives them the opportunities that every human being deserves, no matter where you were born, no matter the color of your skin, no matter your religion, your ethnicity or who you love." (Miami Herald)Excuse me while I go throw up now. I thought the race baiting, etc. would end with the current President. How closed minded and intolerant of me....
